Ruth Lawrence's new production grapples with a difficult
topic in difficult times
The first thing the audience sees is the stage set, which to
my surprise was created by Lois Brown. This is only the second time she has
designed a set to my knowledge. It
is deceptively simple to the eye, a wash of camouflage patterned browns and
tans. The whole of the stage,
which is a farmhouse interior of furniture, drapes, etc, is a mass of dappled
foliage that culminates in treetops.
It is an apt visual metaphor for the central action of hiding the
hunted, the innocent. It is at
times a cozy nest and others a suffocating trap with ingenious visual
solutions.
The beauty of the script for me was that it was
unassuming. It was never strained
or clever. It managed to say a lot
in natural sounding terms. The
ensemble of actors is relatively small and intense. The real power in their acting came to me through their
physicality, the way they inhabited the eroding physical and psychological
states of their characters as their challenging circumstances escalated. The actors went from supportive, tender
embraces to the surrender of crawling on their bellies but made it all appear
inevitable as opposed to melodramatic. HUNGER never succumbs to hyperbole.
Often, the most productive way of delivering medicine is
sugar coating. In the case of
HUNGER the audience is seduced by a gentle start and when the going gets really
rough by a sense of an almost lyrical surrealism. The hardest hitting sequence has an almost dream like
quality. So be assured those of
you considering buying tickets, that this is not a depressing production. It is thought provoking and it will
make you question the motives of many as it probes the fragile divide between
chaos and control, profit and philanthropy, benefit and risk.
No comments:
Post a Comment