These are some of the "specimens" in MIRIAD: a flying fox and trifle jellyfish
For the third time since it opened on March 16th, I have
been to Phillipa Jones' exhibition at The Rooms Provincial Art Gallery. I rarely visit a show on multiple
occasions but this time I felt like I had no choice: I was that intrigued.
Yes, I am there because I am writing about the show – a
review for C magazine. But the
real reason is because I am trying to answer a nagging question in my
brain. "Why do artists adopt
the guise of scientific inquiry and use the mock scientific institution as a
mode of artistic expression?"
MIRIAD stands for the Ministry of Intuitive Research in Imagined and
Actual Discoveries, which is an institution fabricated by Jones. She uses the pseudo- institution as an
artistic device and part of her narrative that posits the discovery of an
island off the coast of Newfoundland, which, due to the most recent Ice Age, is
home to a collection of unique and endangered, or extinct creatures. Jones then took members of the public–
equipped them with the guise of experts such as a cartographer,
anthropologist, or more fancifully plant whisperer and shaman– on an expedition
to this island. These expeditions
are sampled as scenarios for the "mock-umentary" video in the
exhibition.
It seems to me that the adoption of scientific institutions
is actually part of a growing trend in art practice and I am not sure what it
means. Is it to acquire legitimacy
- the kind that we normally accord science? Is it meant to expand the role of art in society? Is it a parody? Is it a search for aesthetics or an
expression of a sensibility?
This is a portion of an epic pen & ink drawing by Jones' it is a tour de force.
And then there is the whole adoption of scientific
technology as a tool in and of itself.
I am thinking about, say the use of medical imaging as a device. There are a growing number of artists
who use CAT scans, X-rays and MRIs of bodies, sometimes but not always their
own. But I think this is built on
the foundation of earlier artists who were intrigued by machines, robots and
technology in general. And let's
not forget those artists like Stellarc, who use their own bodies in combination
with machines as performance art.
The first artist I thought of is Mireille Peron, who is
based at the Alberta College of Art & Design. She straddles art and craft camps and is the founder of the
Laboratory of Feminist Pataphysics (2000). I reached out to her to get her informed opinion on this
question. This is an excerpt from
her response:
It is always nice to
hear from you and what you are up too. It was a pleasure to
discover the work of
Phillipa. Indeed very interesting and quite in the realm of
my Laboratory of
Feminist Pataphysics! I could see why you thought of me : )
At the beginning of
the 20th century, Alfred Jarry invented and described the
indiscipline of ‘pataphysics
as the science of imaginary solutions. Like its
companion —real
physics— ‘pataphysics remains a predominantly male domain. It was to
remedy this evident lack, that I founded in 2000 (to celebrate the
millennium) the
Laboratory of Feminist Pataphysics. Feminist pataphisicists like
to think of their work
as the reinvention of normative science through gendered
fictive narratives.
Pataphysics is the science of the particular, despite the
common opinion that
the only science is that of the general. Feminist
Pataphysics like
Jarry’s pataphysics’ examines the laws governing exceptions,
and explains a
universe supplementary to this one, a pluriverse where exceptions
unfold. Its study
always includes the games governing the exceptions and
sporadic accident. It
seems that MIRIAD fits very well all these criteria.
Mireille Peron's response contained several, insightful
paragraphs and succeeded in stirring up my thinking even more. I will continue to chew away at the
possibilities as I work towards my deadline of April 5th.
In the meantime, do go and see MIRIAD if you are in town or
at least google Phillipa Jones' website: http://www.philippajones.com/2013/03/miriad-exhibition.html
The exhibition is a compilation of several things in
addition to the video: three glowing, multicoloured circular window panels, exquisite
pen and ink drawings, careful watercolour paintings, atmosphere-laden, leather
bound notebooks, and fantastic specimens and artifacts that conjure up a
Victorian aesthetic reminiscent of the early days of the Royal Society. It is a
feast for the eyes and evidence of curator Mireille Eagan's quip that Phillipa is an over-achiever. Yes,
Jones clearly has substantial talent and a work ethic to match.
The show closes April 28th.